EOIR / Immigration Judge
Immigration Judge Dishman, Charles — LaSalle Immigration Court — Asylum Decision Statistics
Over the trailing 12 months, Immigration Judge Dishman, Charles granted asylum in 20.0% of decided cases at the LaSalle Immigration Court, based on FOIA-released EOIR data.
Latest 12-month grant rate
20.0%
Asylum decisions, trailing 12 months
Lifetime total cases
40
All recorded asylum decisions
Court lifetime grant rate
12.2%
Weighted across all judges and all recorded months
Last data refresh
2026-05-21
From Deportation Data Project FOIA release
The court-wide lifetime rate is a stable historical benchmark; this judge's trailing 12-month rate uses the same methodology but a shorter window, so the two values can differ materially.
Monthly grant-rate trend
Frequently asked questions
What is Immigration Judge Dishman, Charles's recent asylum grant rate?
Over the trailing 12 months, Immigration Judge Dishman, Charles granted asylum in 20.0% of decided merit cases at the LaSalle Immigration Court, based on FOIA-released EOIR data. The figure uses the standard methodology: cases granted divided by cases granted plus cases ordered removed.
How does Judge Dishman, Charles's rate compare to the LaSalle Immigration Court overall?
The lifetime grant rate weighted across all judges at the LaSalle Immigration Court is 12.2%. Per-judge rates can diverge from the court-wide aggregate because of caseload mix, time on the bench, and the 2025 asylum-policy shift that changed merit-decision volumes nationally.
How many cases has Judge Dishman, Charles decided?
40 merit asylum decisions appear in the FOIA-released EOIR data for Judge Dishman, Charles. Administrative outcomes (terminations, dismissals) are excluded from the rate.
Is this rate predictive of a specific case outcome?
No. The grant rate is a statistical aggregate over completed decisions, not a prediction. Individual case outcomes depend on case-specific merits, evidence, country conditions, and the quality of counsel. This page is informational and does not constitute legal advice.